Anyway, there was a comment made along the lines of " Do you think Sweet are better than Aerosmith?"
Well I dismissed that outright. The word 'better' doesn't really
figure when comparing bands (I like Aerosmith). Should you judge a band on chart success? If so, how would you do that? Most number ones?Number of weeks in the
charts? International success? I did say something like they have probably been more succesful than Oasis
-meaning units of sales -I guess???? (I didn't push it-just in case I was
wrong!
). I'm not keen on Oasis anyway
. I said it more for the shock factor!!
Has anybody got any facts or figures I can throw in to fight my corner on this???
We all know that the amount of singles the band sold back then to achieve their number 2's would far exceed what a 'number one would be
getting now but I need hard evidence!!!
Please help.


